Section 56 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 56 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 56. Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved.—No fact of which the Court will take judicial notice need to be proved. Complete: the-indian-evidence-act-1872
Section 56 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 56. Fact judicially noticeable need not be proved.—No fact of which the Court will take judicial notice need to be proved. Complete: the-indian-evidence-act-1872
The Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (CGST Act) Section 138 – Compounding of offences (1) Any offence under this Act may, either before or after the institution of prosecution, be compounded by the Commissioner on payment, by the person accused of the offence, to the Central Government or the State Government, as the case
The Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (CGST Act) Section 137 – Compounding of offences. (1) Where an offence committed by a person under this Act is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of business of
Section 55 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 55. Character as affecting damages.—In civil cases, the fact that the character of any person is such as to affect the amount of damages which he ought to receive, is relevant. Explanation.—In sections 52, 53, 54 and 55, the word “character” includes both reputation and disposition; but
The Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (CGST Act) Section 136 – Relevancy of statements under certain circumstances A statement made and signed by a person on appearance in response to any summons issued under section 70 during the course of any inquiry or proceedings under this Act shall be relevant, for the purpose of proving, in
Section 54 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 54. Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply.—In criminal proceedings the fact that the accused person has a bad character is irrelevant, unless evidence has been given that he has a good character, in which case it becomes relevant. Explanation 1.—This section does not apply to
Section 53 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 53. In criminal cases, previous good character relevant.—In criminal proceedings, the fact that the person accused is of a good character, is relevant. Complete: the-indian-evidence-act-1872
The Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (CGST Act) Section 135 – Presumption of culpable mental state In any prosecution for an offence under this Act which requires a culpable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state but it shall be a defence for
The Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (CGST Act) Section 134 – Cognizance of offences. No court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under this Act or the rules made thereunder except with the previous sanction of the Commissioner, and no court inferior to that of a Magistrate of the First Class, shall try
Section 52 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 52. In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant.—In civil cases, the fact that the character of any person concerned is such as to render probable or improbable any conduct imputed to him, is irrelevant, except in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise